Reduce Cost to Collect | RCM Advisory Partners

Understanding the Operational Root Causes of Reduce Cost to Collect

Optimizing revenue cycle performance across a growing medical group, MSO, ASC, or health system requires treating patient access, clinical coding, billing, analytics, and vendor management as a single end-to-end system.

Point fixes fail when upstream and downstream handoffs remain broken: speeding up claim submission without fixing prior authorization only produces faster CARC 197 denials; hiring more A/R collectors without fixing ERA posting maps only creates more manual status-checking.

RCM Advisory Partners benchmarks your operation against HFMA MAP Keys and MGMA specialty standards, isolates the highest-ROI operational levers inside your existing EHR/PM stack, and governs execution across a 30/60/90-day roadmap.

End-to-end 12-domain assessment from scheduling and financial clearance through final cash reconciliation
Benchmarking of Net Collection Rate, Days in A/R, Aged A/R >90, Clean Claim Rate, Denial Rate, and Cost to Collect
Evaluation of internal staff workflows, EHR/PM automation utilization, and external vendor performance
Prioritized 30/60/90-day optimization plan ranked by dollar impact and execution speed

Free RCM Assessment

Where Is Revenue Being Lost?

Get an independent assessment of your revenue cycle performance, operational gaps and opportunities for improvement.

First Name *Last Name *

Work Email *PhoneOrganization *Organization Type *What would you like help with?Message / Additional Information

Please do not submit patient names, medical records, Protected Health Information (PHI), Social Security numbers, or other sensitive patient information through this form. By submitting this form, you acknowledge our Privacy Policy and agree to our Terms of Use.

Financial Stakes: Cash Velocity, Net Yield & EBITDA Protection (M–M+ NPR)

End-to-end optimization typically captures 200 to 600 basis points in additional net collection yield while lowering cost-to-collect and stabilizing Days in A/R.

When revenue-cycle friction compounds across multiple providers, facilities, or payer contracts, the financial damage shows up twice: first as uncollected cash and elevated Days in A/R, and second as inflated Cost to Collect from manual rework.

Reduce Cost to Collect — Executive Performance & Financial Impact Matrix
Performance Dimension	Target Standard	High-Risk Indicator	Operational & Financial Impact
Net Collection Rate Improvement	+200 to +600 bps Lift	Stagnant / Declining Yield	Eliminating cross-functional leakage across access, coding, denials, and underpayments
Total Days in A/R	30 – 38 Days	> 48 Days	Streamlining charge lag, first-pass scrubbing, and dollar-stratified A/R follow-up
Cost to Collect (% of Net Collections)	3.0% – 4.8%	> 6.0%	Automating eligibility, ERA posting, and claim status to reduce manual touches
Executive KPI Visibility	100% HFMA MAP Key Standardized	Unreconciled Departmental Reports	Single source of truth across PM, clearinghouse, and bank deposits

What Leadership Should Evaluate First: Forensic Diagnostic Checklist

Before restructuring internal billing teams, issuing an RCM vendor RFP, or purchasing new automation software, leadership should verify the underlying transaction data across the following diagnostic checkpoints:

End-to-end 12-domain assessment from scheduling and financial clearance through final cash reconciliation
Benchmarking of Net Collection Rate, Days in A/R, Aged A/R >90, Clean Claim Rate, Denial Rate, and Cost to Collect
Evaluation of internal staff workflows, EHR/PM automation utilization, and external vendor performance
Prioritized 30/60/90-day optimization plan ranked by dollar impact and execution speed

Common Mistakes Organizations Make When Addressing This Challenge

Healthcare operators frequently lose 6 to 12 months of momentum—and substantial working capital—by treating symptoms rather than fixing the upstream clinical, intake, or technical handoffs driving the problem.

Purchasing expensive bolt-on software or switching billing vendors before diagnosing core workflow and configuration gaps
Optimizing one department in isolation while ignoring clinic-to-billing handoffs
Lack of weekly KPI governance and named executive ownership during implementation

30/60/90-Day Advisory & Implementation Roadmap

RCM Advisory Partners structures engagements around clear, measurable milestones designed to protect cash flow during execution:

01
Days 1–30: Independent Baseline & Transaction Forensics
Forensic baseline diagnostic of reduce cost to collect across 837 claims, 835 remittances, EHR workqueues, and payer contracts.
02
Days 31–60: Operating Model Design, Workflow Remediation or Partner Selection
Execute targeted workflow, claim scrubber, coding, and vendor SLA remediation with weekly leadership checkpoints.
03
Days 61–90: Execution Oversight, SLA Stabilization & KPI Governance
Verify net cash collection lift, aging reduction, and first-pass resolution gains and transition into ongoing KPI governance.

Frequently Asked Questions

How does RCM Advisory Partners approach reduce cost to collect differently from a traditional billing company?

Because we are an independent advisory firm rather than a software vendor or one-size-fits-all billing company, we start with forensic claim and remittance data to isolate root causes across people, workflow, technology, and external partners before recommending any change.

How quickly can we quantify the financial opportunity in reduce cost to collect?

Our initial RCM diagnostic typically delivers a quantified dollar-leakage baseline and prioritized 30/60/90-day action plan within 2 to 4 weeks, without disrupting daily clinical or billing operations.

Which KPIs and benchmarks do you use to measure success?

We anchor every engagement to HFMA MAP Keys and MGMA specialty benchmarks—tracking True Net Collection Rate against contracted allowables, First-Pass Resolution Rate, Initial Denial Rate by CARC/RARC, Total Days in A/R, Aged A/R >90 Days, and Cost to Collect.

Can you work inside our existing EHR and practice management system?

Yes. Our advisors work directly across Epic, athenahealth, NextGen, eClinicalWorks, Oracle Health, Greenway, ModMed, Experity, and specialty PM platforms—optimizing rules and workflows in your current environment or guiding a structured transition when needed.

Lower Your Cost to Collect by Eliminating Rework, Fragmentation, and Manual Touches.